Abstract                                          

         All praise is due to God, creator of the creation, granting  good, praise suits His dignity as he must be praised, Prayer and peace be upon our  master and prophet Mohammed and his progeny, the light of right     guidance whom God removed all impurity from them and to make them completely pure.                                                                                                         

        The current study aims at acquainting of the owners of garment history(p.b.u.t. ) and was restricted to the Jihadi side rather than other sides under the title ” Ashab Al Kisa’a (p.b.u.t.) in Al Imali Books to Twelve Imams Followers: in Jihadi Aspects”. It was done through three of the most prominent references of Twelve Imams cast represented by AlSedooq, Al Mufeed, and Al Tusi.                                                                            

         It was stated that these books were meetings held by the teacher in presence of his students in limited months in the year and special days in the week where information was delivered by teacher and written down by students.                                                                                                                

        The historical display method and the comparison with other references was adopted where we mentioned the meeting without the document to avoid prolixity. We talked about saying documentation that had doubts and were problematic.                                                                       

         It was clear through study that Al Sedooq, Al Mufeed, and Al Tusi, in their writings mentioned the Jihadi aspects of Ashab Al Kisa’a (p.b.u.t.) in a way totally different from other references, though they were briefly mentioned in a way that did not suit the event. We found that Al Taf battle was mentioned in detail by Al Sedooq but not others, though he ignored some introductions which caused the battle whether what relates to Al kufa messengers t Imam Hussein and their invitation to him to come to them or what relates the issue of sending Muslim Bin Aqeal to kufa and his martyrdom there.                                                                                               

         Al Sedooq also ignored mentioning some figures that can’t be ignored due to their great role in Al Taf battle; those are Abu Al Fadhil Al Abbas (p.b.u.h.) and the lady Zainab (p.b.u.h.), where we didn’t find any information about those two figures in Kerbala.                                                

         It was clear that there were two narrations that disputed figures that no one can dispute them. The first narrations disputed the personality of Hamzah Bin Abdul Muttalib, the prophet Mohammed’s (p.b.u.h.) uncle when it described him as liquor drinker and he was the reason behind forbidding it. We had already proved nullification this narration through studying authority and the body and it was put to distort the image of Hamzah Bin Abdul Muttalib, master of martyrs who was the most sacrifice figure in Auhd battle. In the second narration, we found defamation to Imam Ali and Al Hassan (p.b.u.t.) where the narration stated that Imam Ali (p.b.u.h.) during his marching to Al Jamel (Camel) battle quarreled with his son Imam Al Hassan(p.b.u.h.) and the last accused his father as the main reason to what effect that matter arrived to after killing Othman Bin Affan as turbulence and riots. This made Imam Ali (p.b.u.h.) accused his son by cowardice and feebleness. We proved uselessness of this narration by evidence, and how was done by the Umayyad fake composers to distort the images of two Imams, Imam Ali and Al Hassan(p.b.u.t.) in front of others, their narration in more than fabrication, lying, and imposture.