Abstract

Arabic language has got great efforts to keep its pronunciation clear from all types of deviations. These efforts relate to the beginning of Islam in the Arab homeland. The Holy Quran was a reason for establishing new sciences that Arab had no idea before. These included all known language aspects: phonology, morphology, syntax, and terminology. Efforts of earlier Arab scholars concerning phonology were of remarkable achievements in the language lesson. They did so in order to serve their language. So, they took care with its sciences and searched its secrets and essence. Thus, they provided us with huge linguistic heritage and from this heritage they produced pure Arabic linguistic science which was about to complete the phonological theory to them. The phonological study obtained much importance in studying Arabic. This is simply because studying phonology is the first step for any study since it deals with the smallest unit in the word structure which is the raw material for human speech. Among those who worked too hard to serve this beautiful language and supplied their opinions explicitly or implicitly was ‘ EmadAldin Abu Al fida’a  Ismael Ibn Al Melik AL Iyobi’. That seems clear in his book entitled ‘ Al Kinnash in the Two Arts Syntax and morphology’, since it is obligatory to investigate this language and choose from it what can serve it and push it advanced. We relied on our search on Al Kinnash book in the Two Arts Syntax and morphology, reviewed by the doctor

Reyadh Bin Hassan AL khewam without the reviewed copy by the doctor JoudaMebroukJouda. The study contained three chapters, each has two sections following an analytical descriptive approach concerning displaying Ibi Al Fida’a’s saying to the preceded scholars: the supporters and the opponents. The old and the modern references that deals with this subject were adopted. In this respect, we mention ‘ Al Mufesal’ book and ‘ Al Mufesal ‘ interpretation as well as modern linguistic references. The study reached to some results. The most important of these results is that Abu Al Fida’a was characterized by simplicity of expression, clarity of systematic of sounds in clear constructions aiming to clarify and manifest the issue in a purest shape. The general method that Abu Al Fida’a adopted is connecting between choosing and selecting. It also depended on special terms such as saying, mentioning, recalling, and judging. we also find that his opinion followed three sides. Sometimes, we find that he supports the scientific opinions, or he denies them, or he mentions the conflict among the grammarians themselves from one side, and between the grammarians and the readers from another side without showing any comment or a special opinion that recognizes him from others.